
नवरात्रि में देवी और असुरों की कथा पढ़कर सवाल उठता है: जब दोनों ही प्रकृति हैं, तो लड़ाई किससे है? लड़ाई प्रकृति से नहीं, उस अधूरेपन से है जो मानता है कि दुनिया को भोगकर वो पूरा हो जाएगा। देवता और असुर दोनों यही चाहते हैं। अंतर बस इतना है कि चोट खाकर देवता देखते हैं और लौट आते हैं, असुर फिर वही दोहराते हैं। हम भी रोज़ भोजन, लोगों और चीज़ों से पूरा होने की उम्मीद करते हैं। और ‘सब ब्रह्म है’ कहकर विवेक छोड़ देना भी उसी अहंकार की चाल है। चोट हमें भी लगती है; क्या हम उससे सीखते हैं?

Many of us look for role models of our own gender and hope to succeed as a man or as a woman, yet no one great was ever great as a gender. The moment we tie our aims to being a woman or a man, we tie them to the body, and much of our attention goes into how we look and how we are seen. So much around us keeps reminding a woman of her body, from songs to the fear of a street at night. But the body has never achieved anything by itself. What might we attempt if gender stopped mattering?



Technology has amplified human power, but not human consciousness. The real crisis is not a lack of scientific progress but the unchanged, ego-driven center using it. Education today trains people to consume and achieve, not to understand themselves. Unless self-knowledge grows alongside external knowledge, every technological advance risks becoming a more powerful instrument of greed, violence, and planetary destruction.

A civilisation can achieve extraordinary success in technology, science, wealth, and exploration, yet still move closer to conflict, ecological crisis, and inner dissatisfaction. The missing piece is understanding the human being who creates, chooses, invents, and consumes. Technology and policy can improve efficiency, but they cannot resolve the endless psychological drive for more. Climate change, overconsumption, and misuse of innovation arise from an unexamined human center. Lasting solutions require large-scale self-education, honesty, and deeper awareness of human motives, because the root of global problems lies not only in systems and tools, but in the consciousness that operates them.














Acharya Prashant: Man is both Prakriti and something else. Prakriti is y=sin(x). You are confined within duality- ups and downs, ups and downs, leading to nothing. The up will not remain up, forever; the down will not remain down, forever. Crests and troughs, crests and troughs; that is

Questioner: Acharya Ji, I think this question may be on behalf of many of us sitting in this auditorium. Every student sitting in this auditorium had a dream not of getting admission in Lakshminarayanan Institute of Technology (where the session is being held), but getting into IITs. Then, after IIT,


Acharya Prashant: We do not pay attention to stuff physical and instead keep talking of consciousness, why? Because remember that consciousness is the subject matter of vidya. Avidya talks of everything except consciousness. So science, technology, everything comes in the domain of *avidya*—history, geography, languages, mathematics, economics.

Acharya Prashant: By looking at one Vivekanand, you start imagining, or dreaming, or expecting that all youth can be like Vivekanand. And in this lies your ingratitude and disrespect towards Vivekanand. You do not know what kind of an impossibility a Vivekanand is. You do not appreciate him, so you

“The will to live.” “The will to just continue.” That, he said, is the basic human existential tendency. I’m asking, “Don’t animals have that tendency?” At the root of all consciousness; is the will to survive and continue. We don’t want to die; the animals, too, don’t want to die, right? We feel pain, we suffer; so do animals. The reasons might be very different. Often the reasons are, in fact, not too different. Separate a human mother from her baby and you see the suffering. It’s very apparent. Separate a cow from her calf, and the suffering is much the same. Read more...






प्रश्नकर्ता: नमस्कार सर। सर, दुनिया में दो तरह के सिद्धांत चलते हैं — एक ये कि जवान लोग कहते हैं कि खाओ-पियो बिंदास जियो, और दूसरी ये कि बुज़ुर्ग या दार्शनिक लोग कहते हैं कि जीवन क्या है इसको समझो, अपना पुरुषार्थ दिखाओ, अपनेआप को जानो, इस तरह की बातें।


प्रश्नकर्ता: प्रणाम आचार्य जी। मैं तेईस वर्षीय हूँ। मेरा नाम शैलेश है। मेरा सवाल

Questioner (Q): Acharya Ji, my hormonal imbalance overpowers my ability to continue with conscious behaviour and forces me to continue with compulsive behaviour. How to be more conscious of my actions?



Acharya Prashant (AP): What is this invocation to the gods – Indra, Pūṣā,

प्रश्नकर्ता:


प्रश्नकर्ता: सर प्रणाम। सादर नमन। सर इतनी बातें सुनने के बाद अपनी मन की एक मूर्खता के विषय में आपसे सवाल है। ये अच्छा और बुरा लगता है कि हमने समझ लिया। इस बात पर भी शक है कि अगर मैंने समझ लिया, तो फिर मैं उसपर चल क्यों नहीं

आचार्य प्रशांत: कोई बाहर से तुम पर शासन करे, हुकुम चलाये, आसान होता है पकड़ पाना कि मेरे साथ कुछ ग़लत हो रहा है क्योंकि बहुत स्पष्ट है कि सामने कोई खड़ा हुआ है और वो तुम पर चढ़ बैठने की कोशिश कर रहा है। इंद्रियाँ बाहर की ओर ही…



Technology is neither good nor bad by itself; its impact depends on the person using it. When it replaces independent thinking, confidence, and real-life abilities, it becomes a crutch instead of a source of progress. True advancement requires human maturity to grow alongside technological power. Without inner responsibility, every new innovation risks amplifying the same old weaknesses instead of creating a better future.
किसी प्रदेश की समृद्धि केवल प्राकृतिक संसाधनों से नहीं, बल्कि वहाँ के लोगों की चेतना, शिक्षा और विवेक से तय होती है। खनिज स्वयं विकास नहीं लाते; यदि समाज जागरूक न हो तो वही संसाधन शोषण और भ्रष्टाचार का कारण बन जाते हैं। सच्ची संपदा धरती के नीचे नहीं, मनुष्य के मस्तिष्क में होती है। विद्या और आत्मज्ञान ही किसी राज्य या राष्ट्र को वास्तविक अर्थों में समृद्ध और स्वतंत्र बनाते हैं।
We are very conveniently leaving ourselves more and more at the mercy of technology. But we have to understand that AI operates on data, and data is provided by human beings. If we are dumb, our data will reflect that dumbness. AI has done what it’s programmed to do, but are you doing what you are born to do? You are the user, the ego. And the ego always has a choice. If you don’t exercise choice, there is no elevation; then there is no difference between man and stone.
मिट्टी जीना चाहती है, मिट्टी में ही प्राण है। और मिट्टी की ही जो जीने की इच्छा है, वो समझ लीजिए कि वृक्ष बनकर या जीव बनकर, प्राणी बनकर खड़ी हो जाती है। ये सोचना सबसे बड़ा अज्ञान है कि “मैं और मिट्टी अलग-अलग हैं।” तो कोई बोले कि “मरने के बाद हम कहाँ जाएँगे?” कहीं नहीं जाओगे, तुम राख में ज़िंदा हो अभी। लेकिन इसका मतलब ये नहीं है कि निकलकर इधर-उधर घूमोगे। शरीर से हटकर कोई “जीवात्मा” जैसी चीज़ है: ये फ़िलोसॉफ़िकल एरर है।
Man is usually just prakriti: y = sin(x). You are confined within duality — ups and downs, ups and downs, leading to nothing. But life is life only if there is another curve: y = x. It is the curve of consciousness that is not satisfied with merely being prakriti, the body — eating, excreting, sweating, reproducing. But it is helpless, because ours is a body-dependent consciousness. Hence, your life curve must be y = x + sin(x). Just ensure that the curve of consciousness is steep enough to carry, and rather override, the curve of the body.
The mind is eager to go beyond the daily, mundane experiences, and that’s why the seeker goes to a teacher. But, if the teacher fails in bringing the seeker to the beyond, then this is the option that the teacher has. One will definitely experience a change. But, is the change for the good? Is it a change that takes you higher? No. It’s a bad change. And if this is the route that many spiritual seekers are seeking, then this route is nothing but a verdict upon the disciple and the teacher both.
हम जिसे कॉन्शियसनेस कहते हैं, वह पूरी तरह प्रेडिक्टेबल और रूल-बेस्ड है। कॉन्शियसनेस की जो हमारी परिभाषा है, वह इतनी सीमित है कि AI उस पर आसानी से फिट हो जाता है। मुक्ति अकेली चीज़ है जो फिलहाल मशीन के लिए संभव नहीं दिख रही है। और आप भी मशीन सिर्फ़ तब नहीं हैं, जब आप में मुक्ति की ललक हो। इसलिए AI से पहले, अपनी ज़िंदगी पर विचार करें — आख़िर हमारी ज़िंदगी इतनी मैकेनिकल क्यों है कि एक मशीन भी उसकी नकल कर सकती है।
Adi Shankaracharya goes to his teacher and is asked to introduce himself, and he says, “Cidānandarūpaḥ Śivoham Śivoham — I am pure blissful consciousness; I am Shiv, I am Shiv." My real identity is not at all related to the body. The great teacher is very clearly telling us that Shiv is the one who has nothing bodily about himself. But because we are bodily, our ego does not allow us to admit that there can be anything beyond who we are. And that’s also the cause of all human suffering.
Nobody can halt the march of science and technology. All that science can do, it will do. You will be cloned, replicated, duplicated, and substituted. Therefore, you must come to that within you which is alone, not transferable. Go to Nirvāṇa Ṣaṭkam to know what you are not. That which you are not — let it be copied, substituted, or whatever. And when you can discount everything that you are not, then: "Chidānanda-rūpaḥ Śivo’ham Śivo’ham."
AI has no consciousness; it can only do what it is programmed to do. These are just programmed reactions. If you are in a job that involves this kind of programmable role, your job would be threatened by AI. Human beings, by definition, must be in actions that involve creativity. Machines can never understand. Why were you not into jobs that involved understanding or creativity?
Superconsciousness is not in another dimension; it belongs to this world that we are in. It is a word to emphasize that it is possible to rise above ordinary consciousness. Ordinary consciousness is a state of mental slavery. The more liberated one is internally, the higher is said to be the state of consciousness. And beyond a certain point, you may say that a fellow is superconscious.
Questioner (Q): I watched your recent video - “Loving your fake lifestyle.” In that video you talked about two things. One is abuse of consciousness and another was that corporates are dehumanizing the employees.
In that context I wanted to ask you, this dehumanization actually is not only happening in…
बहुत जल्द ऐसा हो सकता है कि एक सुपर इंटेलिजेंट प्राणी आ जाए, जो हमसे श्रेष्ठ हो, अपने लक्ष्य, दर्शन और नैतिकता खुद तय करे। वह ऐसी सभ्यता खड़ी कर सकता है, जो इंसानी बुद्धि से परे होगी। इसे रोकने का उपाय आज ही करना होगा। जो लोग AI विकसित कर रहे हैं, वे इसी समाज से आते हैं और इसकी प्रवृत्तियों के अधीन हैं। उन्हें देखना होगा कि वे किस दृष्टि से AI को क्या काम सौंप रहे हैं, क्योंकि जो आप आज लिख रहे हैं, वह कल आपको लिख देगा।
I alone am! Nothing else. One could either have consciousness that is related to just these three states, a gross consciousness for which the material is supreme, an emotional mind, a thinker, analytical person who lives in ideas, or somebody who has been able to go beyond these two but is yet restless with this ‘I am'. One’s consciousness could rest in these three states or it could find a peaceful and relaxed home in just nothing. Call it either just nothing or call it absolutely everything — An all pervasive ‘I am', all pervasive ‘I am'.
Spiritual Quotient (SQ) is not about the number of scriptures you have read. It’s not about the verses you have memorized. It’s not about how disciplined you are with your religious practices. SQ is love, honesty, and courage: love for the truth, honesty in acknowledging the truth, and courage to admit that you have been a liar. If you have that, then you have a high SQ. SQ is a choice.
Consciousness is just dead duality, a separation between me and you. It views the other as a threat to my existence because it is my opposite. To be truly alive, reject consciousness—not by becoming unconscious, but by going crazy beyond it: challenge your limits, inflate yourself, expand, and break your boundaries.
Questioner: Good afternoon, my name is Aryan and I am in my first year. So, my question is how to control anxiety, as I have a problem called ‘Hyperhidrosis’ where my hands are too sweaty. So, without thinking, my hands and feet start to sweat and it’s because of anxiety,…
What is…
🔥 "मेरा नाम 'आज़ाद' है, बाप का नाम 'स्वाधीनता' है और मेरा घर है 'जेल'” 🔥
भगत सिंह ने जब अपना घर छोड़ा, तो चिट्ठी के अंत में लिखा, "मेरी शादी की चिंता मत करना, मेरी दुल्हन आज़ादी है"।
एक ओर, जहाँ दुनिया को ये मुद्दा बड़ा गंभीर…
Questioner: Acharya Ji, pranam. Ramana Maharshi says, “Since the self is free from the notions of knowledge and ignorance, how can it be said to pervade the entire body in the shape of sentience or to impart sentience to the senses.”
“Wise men say that there is a connection between…
Questioner: Sir, when you were growing up, is there any special memory, or any time you realized and had this aspiration to become, or go on the spiritual path? Is there something interesting related to your life, from your childhood, that you want us to know?
Acharya Prashant: First of…
Who is most like you? You, yourself. So, be empathetic to yourself first. Then, who is most like you? Your mother, father, siblings; show empathy to them. Then, your neighbors, extended family, and finally, be empathetic to all. Lacking compassion for other conscious beings will only harm you. Kill the animal, and in some way the animal is liberated of its misery, at least in the physical sense. But you, having eaten the animal, will suffer. The flesh keeps you alive, and tomorrow awaits—a dark tomorrow as your punishment.
Questioner: What is Duḥkha?
Acharya Prashant: The thought, the desire of all that which is fleeting, ephemeral is Duḥkha. Why is it Duḥkha? To whom, is it Duḥkha? Few things have to be understood. Everything likes to be in its most stress-free state. That's what even…
प्रश्नकर्ता: समझ कैसे साधे? क्या ध्यान विधियों के निरन्तर अभ्यास से एक दिन ऐसा आता है कि होश पूरे दिन रह पाता है। रोज़ की दिनचर्या के काम को कैसे होशपूर्वक किया जाए? विधि के अभ्यास के बाद कभी-कभी तो होश थोड़ी देर अपनेआप रहता है वो होश बाकि दिन…
Questioner(Q): Hello, sir. Today's session is on Fearless Living. So, with respect to this topic, I would like to ask you, aren't we going against nature if we try to be fearless? Because in the course of evolution, the emotion of fear has never been eliminated. Also, it helps many…
Acharya Prashant (AP): So, there is the type of behaviour that we call as ‘compulsive behaviour’, and she’s rightly…
Questioner: Hello sir, I am Utkarsh. I am pursuing my Master in Philosophy from the Department of Philosophy itself – Delhi University; my question dates back to the perennial debate between the concepts of EQ and IQ. And to expound my question, I would like to elaborate that this dates…
Questioner (Q): Sir, my question is about handling pressure—the pressure of expectations. Sir, when God in Bhagavad Gita says that a human being is bound to make mistakes, why society is not ready to accept mistakes? Everybody is judged in the end by only results. How would you work if…
Questioner (Q): My gratitude, Acharya ji.. I've been listening to you for more than a year. It was a great pleasure, it was an amazing bliss in Rishikesh. And I just bought a book in IISc the first day and I finished reading it in three days because I thought…
The Upanishads are known for their austere monism. Right?…
Questioner (Q): I have been suffering from a type of OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder) called somatic OCD for the last two years. I was in constant fear, every single moment, for around two years. I was on sleeping pills and anti-anxiety pills, but I think what helped me a lot…
प्रश्नकर्ता: नमस्ते आचार्य जी, मेरा प्रश्न विज्ञान से सम्बन्धित है। तो काफ़ी समय से वैज्ञानिक समुदाय और प्रकृति में एक तरीक़े का एक तकरार चल रहा है और काफ़ी हद तक विज्ञान सफल भी हुआ है, कोविड वैक्सीन का उन्होंने निर्माण किया और शायद प्रकृति की जो योजना थी उसको…
आचार्य प्रशांत: कुर्बानी, बलि, माँसाहार, इसको लेकर पिछले दिनों मैंने एक बात-चीत शुरु करी है, वो बढ़िया आगे बढ़ रही है। तो उसमें बहुत लोगों के सवाल आये हैं, आपत्तियाँ भी आयीं हैं। और एक सजीव ज़ोरदार चर्चा चल रही है। मैं समझता हूँ ऐसे संवाद बहुत ज़रूरी हैं गम्भीर…
आचार्य प्रशांत: सिर्फ़ एक व्यक्ति है जिसका सच तुम्हें पता हो सकता है, किसका?
श्रोतागण: अपना।
आचार्य: तो उसकी ओर क्यों नहीं देखते?
जिस एक आदमी का तुम्हें सच पूरा पता हो सकता है उसकी ओर क्यों नहीं देख रहे? क्यों इधर-उधर निहारते हो ? क्यों मन को भटकने देते…
प्रश्नकर्ता: आपने ऐसे बताया कि “तुम कौन हो उसको जानो।“ तो इसको हम कैसे जानें और मन से कैसे अपने-आप को अलग कर के देखें और मन को कैसे अपने ऊपर हावी न होने दें, ‘मैं’ को कैसे कंट्रोल करें हम; और इवेन्चुअली माइंड और बॉडी से डिस्टेंस बना कर…
प्रश्नकर्ता: आचार्य जी प्रणाम। मैं आपको तकरीबन दो सालों से सुन रहा हूँ। उससे पहले से मैं डिप्रेशन से जूझ रहा था। लेकिन सुनने के बाद काफ़ी स्पष्टता आयी और मैं काफ़ी आगे बढ़ पाया हूँ। जो दवाइयाँ मैं पहले से ले रहा था वो काफ़ी कम हो चुकी हैं।…
प्रश्नकर्ता: प्रणाम आचार्य जी, मैं पूरे ध्यान से भी सुनूँ तो भी बाद में याद बहुत कम रहता है, कुछ बातें याद रह जाती हैं बाकी नहीं। क्या मेरा दिमाग़ चुन-चुनकर सुन रहा है और बाद में बाकी बातों को अनसुना कर रहा है?
आचार्य प्रशांत: ये बात बहुत गौर…