Acharya Prashant addresses the alarming scale of animal slaughter in India and globally, highlighting that India's animal slaughter rates are comparable to those of developed nations. He points out the hypocrisy in India's self-image as a non-violent, vegetarian nation, noting that while domestic consumption might be lower, the country is a major exporter of meat and live animals. He critiques the government-supported 'Pink Revolution' and 'Blue Revolution', arguing that terms like 'animal husbandry' are deceptive euphemisms for the systematic killing of animals for profit. He emphasizes that the sheer volume of slaughter—billions of land animals and trillions of fish annually—is a heavy price the environment pays for human existence. Responding to arguments from some in the Muslim community regarding Eid-ul-Adha (Bakrid), Acharya Prashant acknowledges the validity of their point that global daily slaughter far exceeds the numbers killed on that specific day. He agrees that those who consume meat throughout the year have no moral standing to criticize a single day of sacrifice. However, he asserts that one wrong does not justify another; the fact that mass slaughter happens daily does not make the specific killings on Eid acceptable. He calls for a consistent, year-round opposition to meat consumption and urges humanity to reflect on its cruelty, stating that such violence is a stain on the legacy of figures like Mahavir and Gautam Buddha.