Acharya Prashant questions the questioner's assumptions regarding nationalism and the desire to return to one's mother country. He challenges the notion that financial constraints in India are a legitimate reason for not returning, asserting that while money is available, greed is often the actual deterrent. He notes that while the United States may currently offer superior research facilities, the gap between India and developed nations is narrowing. He encourages the questioner to consider the example of figures like Shri Homi Jehangir Bhabha, who did not merely seek existing facilities but actively worked to build and empower institutions within India. Acharya Prashant explains that true nationalism is not based on the coincidence of birth or territorial attachment, which is a trait shared by all animals. He argues that being an Indian is a profound identity that requires a deep understanding of what India truly represents, rather than superficial expressions like supporting a sports team. He suggests that those who do not return to India often never truly belonged to it in the first place. He emphasizes that if one understands the value of India, they will find ways to serve it from anywhere in the world. He distinguishes between a migrant, who moves for personal gain and comfort, and a missionary, who travels globally to fulfill a higher purpose.