What does it mean to Love a Jungle?
Acharya Prashant: You look at the last few centuries. Even the declaration of the rights of man came just three hundred years back. Then came the declaration of the rights of slaves. And in the last century came the Declaration of the Rights of Women.
I am seeing that in the current century, we will see a very clear declaration of a new relationship between man and the environment. Climate change will catalyze that new relationship, the threat of climate change.
In a superficial way, it will be called ‘an acceptance of the right of animals to live’, just as the last century saw men accepting the rights of women to vote. You will soon see a broad consensus emerging on the right of all species to live and survive in their own particular way, whether or not that way is agreeable to man.
That will happen. That has to happen. That has to happen for mankind’s dignity and mankind’s survival.
Mankind cannot survive even in a physical way—and I am just talking of the self-interest of mankind. Mankind cannot survive even in the physical way if mankind does not know how to relate with stuff outside of his own body. It would be simply calamitous.
So, those who will understand will live out of understanding, and hence live in a harmonious way, in a way of Love. And those who will not understand will be compelled, because of their own self-interest, to live harmoniously; otherwise, their physical survival will be threatened. So, both ways it is going to be very fresh and very new. Very fresh and very new.
If you really understand what it means to love a jungle, wonderful. And even if you do not know what it means to love a jungle, you still better respect the jungle. Otherwise, you will be eliminated. That is going to happen.
After men, slaves, women, homosexuals, and transgenders, now it is the turn of animals to assert their rights in their own way. They will. They are. They are doing that already.
Questioner: Does it feel to you that things are happening faster now, and like you said, that it is a progression now?
Acharya Prashant: Yes, of course. Things are happening faster now.
You see, when I look around even in this gathering, there are these one, two, three, four, five, six, seven of us who are males. And each one of us is carrying a beard.
Do you know what the ‘beard’ implies? The ‘beard’ indicates our animal nature. So, mankind is more readily accepting its animal nature. We are not as suppressive of ourselves as we used to be. Have you not seen this? Have you just noticed the proportion of men sporting beards these days? And I hope it’s just not a passing fad.
(Pointing at his beard) ‘This’ means that I am alright with my hair, and the hair indicates the animal. “I am alright with my hair. I don’t really have to shave it all off.” The razor is society. The razor is the intellect.
Man is becoming more comfortable with his own skin and in his own skin. Man is seeing that to be a man is to have God in the heart and the soil in the body.
One has to be very comfortable with the soil, very-very comfortable. And the soil has all the animals, the soil has all the jungles. If you are not comfortable with the animals and the jungle, you will never be comfortable with yourself.
Bearded, you are likely to be less afraid of the dog, believe me. Have you seen how most people are so suspicious even of street dogs? Those who are suspicious and afraid even of a little puppy or a cow, to them I say, keep a beard. ‘The beard’ is not merely facial hair, it is more than that. That does not mean that I am a beardist or something. It’s just that I saw all of us having this, so I found it apt to use the beard as a symbol, as an example. Nothing else.
It is changing. It is obviously changing.
You see, whatever technology had to offer, a lot of that it has already offered. You look at Physics; Physics is reaching its boundary. Man was living in hope, in utopia that the solution to the internal discomfort will come from outside; from Science, from technology, from objects, from material. It has not arrived from there.
So, that hope has been shattered. The expectations that we had from ‘the machine’ have not been answered. The machine has failed. The machine did what it could, and the machine has been useful, but the machine has not given us what we really wanted from the machine.
Knowledge and science have not really given us what we really wanted from them. Internally, man is still hungry. Internally, man feels still an alien and dispossessed. If you look into man’s eyes, they are still searching, rootless, wandering. Man is still looking for his anchor, for his source, so man will have to necessarily look into some other direction. Outside, all the directions have been exhausted. So, now only one direction is left: inside.
Man will have to look inside.
And when you look inside, you will find that there is a little rabbit there, an elephant there, a whale there, some fish there, lots of trees there, all these birds there. It will be difficult for you then to have them for breakfast. It would be like then consuming your own liver for breakfast. How sane is that?
Full article link: https://acharyaprashant.org/en/articles/food-is-not-just-food-1_c567081
