So, if I really love Krishna, obviously I will be going through the Gītā 2000 times. And in the light of Gītā , I will then read *Bhagavat Purana* , *Harivansh Purana* , many other *Puranas* ; and then I will be able to understand the stories in the Puranic way. Without understanding the Gītā , how will you understand the *Purana* ? Read more...
This summary is AI-generated. Please read the full article for complete understanding.
Questioner: Namaste Acharya ji. Sir, in one of your podcasts, you had stated that the Upanishad says, Neti-Neti to personify the God—the God in the personified way. Because sometimes, it's like disrespecting God, that ultimate Brahm . (doesn’t add to context)
But, in Bhakti Marg (the path of loving devotion), it is said that we are first to assume that God and with the help of Naam, Roop and Leela , we should try to reach that ultimate Brahm or that ultimate God. So, it's, both are somewhere conflicting.
I am following you and I am also following Bhakti Marg . I am in a dilemma, what to follow? Whether to personify that God in that being or not?
Acharya Prashant: See, Brahm is not God—it's a popular misconception. Brahm
