It doesnтАЩt matter whether you talk of *Advait* or *Dvait*. Do you finally admit that you cannot proceed any further with words? If your *Advait* says that I have come to the final truth, then your *Advait* is bogus. If your *Dvait* says that this is the ultimate expression, then your *Dvait,* too, is a fallacy. You may say *Advait,* you may say *Dvait,* you may even say *Trait,* or you may say anything of your choice. You are free to say whatever you want to, but all of that must surrender.
This summary is AI-generated. Please read the full article for complete understanding.
Questioner: Shankaracharya proclaimed the Advait (non-dualism) philosophy and Madhavacharya proclaimed Dvait (dualism) philosophy. We cannot say who is correct and who is incorrect. That was their truth. These two are extremely opposite. Which is the exact Truth?
Acharya Prashant: One may put it in words of his personal choice. And it is alright. Finally, one must surrender to a reality beyond the mind. It doesnтАЩt matter whether you talk of Advait or Dvait. Do you finally admit that you cannot proceed any further with words? If your Advait says that I have come to the final truth, then your Advait is bogus. If your Dvait says that this is the ultimate expression, then your Dvait, too, is a fallacy. You may say Advait, you may say Dvait, you may even say Trait, or you may say anything of your choice. You are free to say whatever you want to, but all of that must surrender. All of that must finally say that beyond this we cannot say anymore. That is the only mark of the right exposition.
