Acharya Prashant explains the profound similarity between Lao Tzu's philosophy and Shri Krishna's concept of selfless action. Lao Tzu claimed he could never be defeated because he had no desire to win, a state where one is already so 'defeated' that no external force can conquer them. Similarly, Shri Krishna teaches selfless action, where one acts or fights without the craving for victory. When the desire to win is absent, action becomes a play, energy remains full, and the mind stays calm despite external chaos. This state of 'action in inaction' ensures that while the body may tire, the mind remains fresh and unburdened by mental fatigue. Using the example of Shri Krishna's battle with powerful wrestlers, Acharya Prashant clarifies that his victory was not a mere miracle of divine strength but a result of deep understanding and psychological freedom. While the wrestlers were under immense pressure to maintain their image and win, Shri Krishna was like a village boy playing a game. The wrestlers were burdened by their own strength and expectations, making them predictable and easily frustrated. Because Shri Krishna had no egoic stake in the outcome, he remained light and unpredictable, rendering the wrestlers' tactics useless. Their energy was wasted in aggression and provocation that found no target in the smiling, detached Shri Krishna. Acharya Prashant emphasizes that power often fails when it is dependent on a specific reaction from the opponent. The wrestlers' strength was based on the assumption that Shri Krishna would react with anger or conventional combat, but his playful response neutralized their force. This illustrates that true victory comes to those who are not obsessed with winning. By bringing the wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita into the arena, one can see that Shri Krishna won because he was 'floating' and free, while his opponents were crushed under the weight of their own seriousness and desire for success.