Acharya Prashant addresses the use of personal pronouns and humanoid forms for the formless truth in scriptures. He explains that while the truth is nameless and formless, spiritual teachers use terms like 'him' or 'you' because listeners are deeply identified with their own bodies. Since humans perceive themselves as physical entities, they can only relate to something that is also embodied. If God were presented strictly as formless to a body-identified person, God would effectively be excluded from that person's universe. Therefore, attributing a form to the divine is a pedagogical necessity for those who have not yet reached the peak of understanding. Once an individual begins to see themselves as formless, they gain the right to know God as formless. Regarding the use of masculine pronouns, Acharya Prashant traces this to the influence of Sankhya Yoga. In this tradition, the entire material world and all embodied beings are considered 'Prakriti', the feminine principle, while the principle of consciousness is 'Purush', the masculine principle. In the Bhakti tradition, all beings—regardless of their physical gender—are seen as spiritual females longing for union with the one eternal Purush. Thus, referring to God as 'He' or 'Husband Lord' is not an assertion of patriarchy but a symbolic representation of the soul's relationship with the divine. Even human males are considered spiritually feminine in this context. Finally, Acharya Prashant discusses the concept of remembering God and the nature of suffering. He clarifies that God is not demanding; rather, humans choose to stay away from the divine. Suffering arises from this self-chosen 'godlessness'. Remembrance, or 're-membering', is the process of becoming one with the divine again after separation. He suggests that one's own suffering serves as the best trigger for remembrance. When the 'suffering quotient' rises, it indicates that the individual has been denying or staying away from the truth, signaling that it is time to return to the divine presence.