On YouTube
How important is the physical presence of Guru? || Acharya Prashant (2018)
Acharya Prashant
384 views
7 years ago
Guru
Ego
Enlightenment
Spirituality
Submission
Human Nature
Mission
Politics
Description

Acharya Prashant discusses the complexities of physical proximity to a guru, noting that while it can be helpful for the innocent and devoted, it often backfires for most people. Being physically near a guru reveals their ordinary human nature, such as daily habits and physical ailments, which can shatter a student's idealized or 'hallowed' image of an enlightened being. He emphasizes that enlightenment is a myth in the sense that the guru remains a human being who eats, sleeps, and experiences pain. This ordinary humanness is the 'guru element' that allows for communication with others. He advises maintaining a safe distance to preserve the ability to listen without being distracted by the guru's mundane physical existence. Regarding offerings, Acharya Prashant explains that people often give material gifts like sweets or clothes to avoid surrendering their ego, which is the only thing truly precious. He points out the absurdity of giving gifts without knowing the recipient's needs or sizes, suggesting that these are often just ways to avoid real submission. He further addresses the difficulty of maintaining a spiritual focus while remaining in a non-spiritual ecosystem. While one might fantasize about being a 'double agent' who earns money in a corporate environment to fund a holy mission, he argues this is unsustainable because the environment eventually determines one's thinking and the master of that environment will demand their 'pound of flesh' in terms of time and control. Finally, he clarifies that joining a spiritual mission does not mean living a dictated or micromanaged life. A true mission requires individuals capable of independent action who understand the core purpose and act accordingly without constant supervision. He shares that in his own organization, he does not micromanage logistics or finances, relying instead on capable individuals. He concludes by stating that 'politics' in any organization is simply the result of an insecure or dominating mind and that a deeper spiritual quotient naturally reduces political behavior.