Acharya Prashant explains that distinguishing between physical and mental tendencies is a futile exercise that serves as a distraction from the actual problem of bondage. He uses the analogy of a person sitting on a railway track with a train approaching; in such a situation, questioning whether the train is coming from the left or right, or whether it is a diesel or electric engine, is irrelevant. The only necessary action is to move out of the way. Similarly, whether a tendency originates in the body or the mind, its effect is the same—it consumes time and energy and keeps one bound. He argues that humans create categories and hierarchies of bondages to justify keeping some while discarding others. People often label certain desires like lust as 'low-grade' while viewing social responsibilities or duties as 'high-grade' or respectable, failing to realize that both are forms of attachment. He further elaborates that these distinctions are often used as excuses to maintain harmful habits. He provides examples of how people rationalize their actions, such as someone claiming progress by switching from eating large animals to smaller ones, or society accepting lust within a marriage while condemning it outside. Acharya Prashant emphasizes that if a tendency like lust takes away your energy and prevents you from challenging your limitations, it is a hindrance regardless of its source. He points out the hypocrisy in social norms where certain attachments are deemed acceptable, noting that a mind conditioned by constant stimulation will naturally project that state onto everything it encounters. The focus should not be on the classification of the tendency, but on the fact that it is a barrier to freedom.