Acharya Prashant clarifies that Brahman is not God, and the objective of spirituality is truth realization rather than God attainment. He explains that God attainment often requires a belief in the egoistic self, whereas truth realization involves the dissolution of the ego and seeing oneself as invalid. He critiques the popular misconception of personifying the ultimate reality, stating that such personification is a form of disrespect to the ultimate Brahman. He emphasizes that the ego seeks security and continuity by dragging the divine down to its own level through imagination and personal narratives. Addressing the questioner's reliance on Puranic stories and the concept of Bhakti Marga, Acharya Prashant asserts that true devotion is not about imagination, which he describes as a subtle activity of the ego. He argues that if one considers Shri Krishna to be the ultimate, one must prioritize the Bhagavad Gita over other texts like the Shrimad Bhagavatam. He explains that the Gita defines a 'person' as a myth, and therefore, personifying Shri Krishna turns him into a myth. He stresses that one cannot attain Shri Krishna while remaining attached to their own personhood and illusory identity. Acharya Prashant concludes that the entire purpose of spirituality and the Bhagavad Gita is to help an individual emerge from the illusory narrative of personhood to alleviate suffering. He advises the questioner to go directly to the Bhagavad Gita to understand the truth, rather than relying on external interpretations or romanticized imaginations. He suggests that even the second chapter of the Gita is sufficient to settle debates regarding names, forms, and the nature of the divine, as it provides the foundational understanding necessary to interpret other scriptures correctly.