Acharya Prashant states that man's mind has become so lustful that he needs lust even in spirituality. He explains that a person will only turn towards spirituality if it is showered with words like 'semen' and 'sexual intercourse'. He questions which saints ever sang songs of semen and intercourse, giving the examples of Meera, Lalleshwari, and Akka Mahadevi. While Meera worships Krishna and the others are in love with the supreme being, there is not the slightest trace of lust in their songs or sayings. This obsession with semen, the speaker argues, is a necessity for commercial spirituality, which promises liberation through the use of semen to attract people who are already preoccupied with such thoughts. He contrasts this with the teachings of saints like Kabir Saheb, Raidas, and Nanak Saheb, who never spoke of such things. They never claimed that by raising one's semen, one would reach heaven. He reminds the audience that an action is good only if it leads to liberation, which requires the desire for liberation to be at the center of one's mind. However, for most, semen is at the center, so they seek a liberation related to semen. The crucial factor is one's intention; with a pure intention, even obstacles become a bridge, but with an impure one, the bridge itself is broken for petty attachments. The speaker asserts that the only subject of spirituality is liberation, and he has no interest in entertainment. He observes that people's minds are so entangled in semen that their questions are about sex, not liberation or bondage. He uses the analogy of a prisoner in chains from head to toe, who should only desire freedom. Such a person can only find time for lust if they have compromised with their chains. True meditation is not a specific technique but a rebellion against these chains—an outrage and boiling anger against one's current state of bondage. When freedom is the ultimate goal, life itself becomes meditation. He compares life to the battlefield of Kurukshetra, where one is at war. In such a dire situation, discussing semen is absurd. He points out that in the battlefield, blood is shed, not semen. Kabir's warrior sheds blood. The speaker concludes that this new obsession with semen is a forceful and inappropriate intrusion into spirituality. He emphasizes that he deals with battles and knows the real challenge is not related to such trivial matters.