Acharya Prashant clarifies the distinction between the words of Shri Krishna and Arjun in the Shrimad Bhagavad Gita. He explains that while Arjun claims in the final chapter to be free of delusion and ready to follow Shri Krishna's commands, these are Arjun's own perceptions of his state and not necessarily the absolute truth. The speaker emphasizes that just because Arjun's words are recorded in the Gita, they do not hold the same authority or spiritual weight as the words of Shri Krishna. Arjun's belief that he had attained complete clarity was superficial, as evidenced by his later admission that he had forgotten the teachings due to a restless mind. Acharya Prashant further highlights the vast dimensional difference between Shri Krishna and Arjun. Despite their physical proximity, friendship, and similar appearance as noblemen, there is no equality in their spiritual stature. He compares the relationship to a massive banyan tree and a small blade of grass. The necessity for the 'Anugita' (referred to as Uttar Gita) arose because Arjun was unable to retain the profound wisdom imparted during the war. Shri Krishna even expresses slight annoyance at Arjun's lack of focus and intellect, noting that Arjun was not even capable of remembering the teachings, let alone having them manifest from within himself.