Acharya Prashant explains that non-doership does not mean that someone else is performing the actions instead of the individual; rather, it signifies that the individual 'I' does not exist as a doer at all. He describes two levels of non-doership. First, when actions are driven by habits, conditioning, and tendencies, it is the conditioning that acts, not the person. Second, when actions arise from a causeless awareness or spontaneous realization that is independent of past knowledge or experience, it is that awareness itself that acts. In both scenarios, the individual ego is not the doer. Shri Krishna represents this awareness, while Maya represents the conditioning; since both originate from the same source, the individual is never the actual performer of any action. He further clarifies that the sense of being a 'doer' is fundamentally a falsehood because the entity that claims to be the doer does not exist. The only reality is either Truth or conditioning. Therefore, asking 'what is the right action?' is an invalid question because it assumes the existence of an individual doer. Instead, the only valid inquiry is to ask 'who is the doer?' or 'who am I?'. Once it is realized that the 'I' is not the doer, the appropriate action becomes clear spontaneously without the need for external guidance. The mistake people make is trying to preserve the 'I' while seeking the right path, whereas the true resolution lies in questioning the very existence of that 'I'.