Acharya Prashant explains that spiritual teachings often appear contradictory because they are directed at the ever-changing state of the human mind. He describes the seeker as a moving target, and the Guru's words as arrows aimed at wherever the seeker is currently positioned. When a person identifies with the physical body or a limited object, the Guru provides a subtler identification to break the previous one. For instance, if one identifies with a 'pot', the Guru might say they are the 'all-pervading sky' to negate the limited identity of the pot. However, as soon as the seeker clings to the new identity of being the 'sky', the Guru must negate that as well, stating they are not even the sky. He further clarifies that positive or affirmative language used by sages is not meant to give the seeker a new permanent identity, but is a tactical tool to help them let go of a grosser attachment. Since the mind cannot remain in a state of total negation or emptiness, it requires a substitute to hold onto while it releases an old habit. The Guru progressively provides subtler and more refined objects of focus until the mind eventually encounters the formless. Because the formless cannot be grasped, the mind's attempt to hold it leads to its own dissolution. Acharya Prashant notes that a Guru like Shri Ashtavakra can perceive the internal shifts in a disciple like King Janak through his expressions and presence, adjusting the teaching even without the disciple asking a new question.
