Acharya Prashant addresses the question of why it is difficult to let go of something even when one knows it is wrong. He explains that the questioner has not truly seen *why* it is wrong. To properly see that something is wrong, one does not need any special or divine powers; it simply requires effort. One must be willing to experiment, investigate, ask questions, and pose difficult challenges to one's beliefs. The speaker points out a common human tendency to use even a small amount of doubt as an excuse for inaction. He explains that when a person is, for example, 60% or even 99% sure that something is wrong, they will misuse the remaining 40% or 1% of uncertainty to tell themselves that the matter is still undecided and pending. When the time for action comes, they will side with the small percentage of doubt, using it as a pretext to avoid making a change. This, he states, is a game of dishonesty. If there are 99 reasons in favor of a decision and only one against it, siding with the one reason is a way to protect the ego. The solution, Acharya Prashant suggests, is to eliminate even that last bit of doubt. One must investigate it, get the necessary information, and settle the matter completely. He clarifies that he is not against doubt itself; doubt is valuable when it leads to curiosity and exploration. However, people often cherish their doubts, using them as a shield to avoid action and maintain their current state. When a doubt arises, it should be resolved through inquiry and experimentation, not preserved. He gives the example of the difficult questions we avoid asking ourselves, like "Why am I doing this job?" We avoid them because we already know the answer, and that answer would compel us to change. We prefer to keep running and remain busy to avoid the opportunity for deep thought. The speaker also mentions J. Krishnamurti's teaching about not identifying with thoughts and explains that one should inspect thoughts without getting entangled in them.