Acharya Prashant addresses the question of whether one should consider oneself the doer. He states that for a common person, it is practically very important to constantly consider oneself the doer. He clarifies that this is not a metaphysical or ultimate truth, but a useful and practical stance for daily life. The useful approach is to believe, "I have done it." If one does not accept this, it implies they have no right to act, and consequently, no ability to make right choices, leaving life to continue as it is. Not accepting doership can become an excuse, where one might say, "I didn't do it; some God or creator did. The real doer is someone else." The core issue is not who the ultimate doer is, but what one has believed so far. Since we have always considered ourselves the doer, especially while making mistakes, we must also take the responsibility to rectify them. It would be dishonest and irresponsible to claim doership for mistakes but then shift the blame when it's time for consequences or correction. He uses the analogy of eating at a restaurant and then refusing to pay the bill by claiming that God ate through him. Further, Acharya Prashant explains that the idea of eliminating the ego or having a sense of non-doership is not what is needed. Instead of eliminating the ego, one must refine it, give it the right direction, and connect it to the right thing. He points out that even Shri Krishna in the Gita uses the word "I," indicating that the "I" or ego is not to be erased but sublimated. The practical path is to accept, "I am, and I take responsibility for living the right life and connecting with the right things." The ego is an emptiness that seeks to fill itself; therefore, one must choose to connect with the right things. As a doer, one will inevitably act, so the focus should be on performing the right actions. He concludes by referencing Kabir Saheb, suggesting that one should make all senses and tendencies servants of the Divine, rather than trying to destroy them.