Acharya Prashant begins by questioning the audience about their online search habits, asking when they last searched for terms like 'liberation' (Mukti), 'truth' (Satya), 'salvation' (Moksha), 'Nirvana', 'Vedanta', or 'philosophy' (Darshan). He points out that because people do not search for such topics, videos related to them do not appear in their recommendations. Consequently, the only way to disseminate this knowledge is through promotion, which is necessary because society is in a fallen state. He explains that without promotion, this wisdom would be lost, and this promotional work requires donations, of which they receive less than a tenth of what is needed. He states that when people become capable of recognizing and promoting what is right on their own, the need for promotions and donations will cease. In response to a question about the criteria for finding a life partner, Acharya Prashant advises against searching for one at all. He suggests that if one must search, it should be for something worthwhile, like the great individuals of history, rather than an ordinary person. He criticizes the tendency to idealize a potential partner, stating that lust often blinds people to reality. He illustrates this by saying that a man might call a woman who can't even pass her B.Sc. exams his queen, unable to see her true nature. He humorously adds that a girl's brother, knowing her reality, would laugh at her suitor's ignorance, and that the suitor himself would realize this and regret it after a few years. Acharya Prashant further elaborates that one should not be so idle as to have time to search for a partner. He observes that for the youth in India, life's two main projects are often finding a girl and securing a government job (like UPSC), with the job being a means to get the girl. He identifies the root of this pursuit as lust, not a genuine need for a job. He clarifies that he is not advocating for celibacy but for prioritizing more meaningful pursuits in life. He asserts that the life of an animal also consists of food and a mate, questioning what makes a human different if they pursue the same. He concludes by advising the questioner to place excellence at the center of their life and to engage in the highest work possible. He believes that when one is dedicated to excellent work, a suitable partner may come into their life by chance or providence. If a partner does not appear, one should remain content. The priority, he stresses, should be one's work. Finding a partner should be left to chance, not made into a life mission.