Acharya Prashant discusses the distinction between sattvic, rajasic, and tamasic intellect as described by Shri Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita. He explains that a sattvic intellect correctly identifies the paths of work, renunciation, right and wrong action, and liberation. In contrast, rajasic intellect has a distorted view of dharma, and tamasic intellect views everything in a perverted light, mistaking wrong for right. He critiques modern 'pop spirituality' for claiming that there is no right or wrong, arguing that such claims are merely a defense mechanism for the ego. He asserts that as long as an individual is prone to suffering and identified with the ego, the concepts of right and wrong remain critically relevant. He emphasizes that only two types of people can truly say there is no right or wrong: those who are physically dead and those who are spiritually liberated. For everyone else, right action is that which relieves existing suffering without adding to it. Acharya Prashant warns that pop spirituality deludes people into believing they have already reached the goal of liberation when they have barely begun the journey. This false sense of perfection prevents necessary spiritual progress and serves only to comfort the ego. He concludes that teachers who validate students' current states as already perfect are often engaged in a mutual conspiracy to maintain the status quo and avoid the bitter truth of one's egoistic tendencies.