Acharya Prashant argues that treating the human body as a machine for reproduction is an abuse and that the function of reproduction should move out of the female body. He contends that women cannot attain their rightful purpose in life if their energy is squandered on pregnancy. Historically, fertility was venerated because small populations and high mortality rates made a fertile womb a great asset for manpower and survival. However, he suggests that motherhood and pregnancy have been glorified through cultural conditioning and fairy tales, while in reality, no woman truly enjoys the physical and mental trauma of pregnancy. He emphasizes that a woman's prime years should not be consumed by nursing and child-rearing, which limits her growth as a human being. He proposes that science should take over the mechanical aspects of childbirth through specialized facilities where babies are conceived, incubated, and raised. This would liberate women from the physical burdens and risks of delivery, allowing them to focus on elevating the consciousness of the child. Acharya Prashant asserts that the mother's true role should be that of a teacher and a guide for wisdom and discretion, rather than a mere birth giver. He compares this shift to how humanity has already liberated its muscles from mechanical labor through machines, suggesting that the womb should be similarly liberated to allow for a relationship based on consciousness rather than just physical biology. Addressing concerns about genetic engineering and the potential for a divide between the rich and poor, Acharya Prashant explains that physical attributes like height, strength, or intelligence are merely resources and do not guarantee a meaningful life. He emphasizes that the ultimate purpose of life is the elevation of consciousness, which is a matter of choice and cannot be manufactured by machines or genetics. He notes that history is full of individuals who were born with great gifts but lived miserable lives, while others with few resources made significant impacts through their choices. Ultimately, he maintains that the ability to choose freedom is independent of the body one carries.