Acharya Prashant addresses a questioner's confusion regarding UG Krishnamurti's assertion that all spiritual teachers are fraudsters. He acknowledges that spirituality is often a field for fraudulence because the masses are gullible and prefer sermons over meaningful dialogue. He explains that many teachers avoid being questioned because they fear exposure, whereas true teaching should be a conversation rather than a one-sided discourse. He notes that people are often conditioned by parents and society to remain silent and accept beliefs without investigation, leading to a lack of genuine exploration in spiritual matters. Regarding the questioner's feelings of doubt and deviation from his path, Acharya Prashant emphasizes that doubt is a welcome and necessary state. He argues that it is better to be doubtful than to have false confidence or cheap faith. He encourages the questioner to investigate his path and his teacher thoroughly, stating that if a path is right, questioning will only deepen one's trust. He cites the example of Swami Vivekananda, who remained doubtful of Shri Ramakrishna Paramhansa for a long time, which eventually led him to a true teacher. Faith that does not begin with doubt is described as flimsy and lacking significance. Finally, Acharya Prashant discusses the nature of perception and the words of spiritual teachers. He explains that while teachers may speak from meditative depths, their words are often contextual and sometimes incoherent. He advises the questioner not to get fixated on specific statements, such as those regarding the dimensions of perception, but to apply his own mind and read diversely. He concludes that as one continues to explore and read with empathy, the meanings of various teachings will become progressively clearer.