Acharya Prashant addresses the question of implementing a one-child policy in India by first stating that "India is a concept." He explains that in a functioning democracy, a policy cannot be imposed unless the people are first convinced of its necessity. He refers to the population control policy during the emergency period, which was enforced and subsequently backfired, leaving politicians hesitant to broach the subject since. For such a policy to be enacted and enforced, a loose consensus must first be built through education. While acknowledging an emerging consensus and better-educated populace, he also points out the existence of dissenting voices concerned with religious demographics. He calls the one-child policy a "beautiful idea" and suggests that, at a minimum, individuals who choose to have one or no children should be incentivized, supported, and honored. On the topic of euthanasia, Acharya Prashant posits that it is fundamentally an issue of human dignity. He believes it "behoves human dignity" to have the right to choose one's death, making a clear distinction between euthanasia and suicide. He describes euthanasia as a conscious choice made when one realizes their time has come, the body is failing, and the probability of recovery to a normal life is extremely slim. He suggests that when medical experts can certify this low probability, a person should have the option to opt out of life. He concludes that it is more dignified to depart by choice rather than by chance or compulsion, after living a deep and purposeful life.