Acharya Prashant addresses a questioner who claims that modern scientific intelligence has rendered ancient scriptures like the Bhagavad Gita and Upanishads obsolete. He challenges the questioner to gather the most intelligent scientific minds or even a supercomputer to explain the true meaning of a single Shloka, such as the Shanti Path from the Upanishads. He emphasizes that while a computer can translate words into hundreds of languages, it cannot grasp the actual meaning. Translation is merely linguistic, whereas the true meaning of spiritual verses lies beyond the reach of objective analysis. He explains that science is fundamentally the study of objects—the objective world perceived through the senses. However, science does not address the 'subject' or the consciousness that perceives those objects. Spirituality, or the science of the Self, focuses on the 'I' (Aham) and the nature of the observer. Acharya Prashant asserts that science and spirituality are not contradictory but complementary; science deals with the external world, while spirituality deals with the internal. He concludes that spirituality is primary because the observer must exist to study the external world, and true scientists hold the Upanishads in high regard, unlike those with a shallow understanding of both fields.