Acharya Prashant addresses a question regarding his criticism of children dancing in reality shows, which the questioner considers an art form. He responds that the problem is immense and asks the questioner to consider the kind of songs the children dance to, the gestures they make, and the purpose of their participation. He explains that humans are born with a body that inherently contains animalistic tendencies (pashuvikta) and all sorts of flaws. He questions the logic of making children dance to songs specifically written to incite these very flaws. He gives examples of songs like "Munni Badnaam Hui" (Munni was defamed) and "Main Tera Butter Chicken Hoon" (I am your butter chicken), questioning how a six or eight-year-old girl can be made to dance to them. He asks what kind of feelings are being instilled in these children and exclaims, "To hell with such art!" He points out that a young girl is made to perform an item number, and the audience, including her parents and relatives, applauds. He argues that while femininity and lust naturally arise around the age of 13-14, these shows turn a six-year-old into a complete woman, and he questions how anyone could not see a problem with this. Acharya Prashant clarifies that in India, dance has traditionally been dedicated to the divine. He states that these suggestive gestures and cheap displays of lust cannot be called dance. He emphasizes that he is not against dance itself but against the vulgar songs and the intention of pushing children into obscene reality shows for money and fame. He condemns the parents, the audience, the show's organizers, and the judges, asking why they are snatching away the children's innocence for trivial gains like applause and fame. He concludes by posing a rhetorical question: if a film is not suitable for children to watch, how can it be appropriate for a child to dance to one of its vulgar songs?