Acharya Prashant addresses a question about practicing non-doership as a householder by analyzing an example from Ramana Maharshi. He explains that the example of a government treasury officer is fitting because the officer handles a lot of money but does not intend to consume it. The officer's relationship with the money is one of non-attachment; he has no personal hopes or expectations from it, as none of it will go into his own pockets. This illustrates the core of non-doership, which is intimately linked to the intention behind one's actions. The speaker clarifies that the more you intend to act to gratify yourself with consumption, the more deeply you will remain the doer, which he calls the false doer. To practice non-doership, one must constantly ask, "How much of what I am doing is intended for my personal consumption?" The more you act with the desire to consume the fruit of your action, the more entrenched you are in the mire of doership. He notes that while the example of the officer has its limits, as the officer does work for a salary, the principle remains. Doership is best detected by observing one's relationship with the fruits of their actions, as this is the most gross and easily detectable aspect. For instance, what you do with your paycheck is irrefutable proof of why you worked for the entire month. This applies not only to material consumption but also to psychic consumption, such as feeling inflated by praise. If you consume the praise, it reveals why you worked. By seeing what you do with the fruits of your labor, you will know why you act, and therefore, you will know who the actor is. Once the actor is exposed, the path to non-doership becomes clearer.