Acharya Prashant addresses the misconception that great saints like Kabir Saheb, Guru Nanak Dev, and Adi Shankaracharya possessed a unique originality that is missing in contemporary spiritual teachers. He explains that originality is often an obsession of the ego; true saints do not claim to create something new but rather draw from a shared, eternal source. Even the Upanishadic sages stated that they were conveying what they had heard from those who knew. There is no fundamental difference between the realization of Ashtavakra, Buddha, or Kabir Saheb, as they all listen to the same truth, regardless of the time period or the medium through which they received it. He emphasizes that Kabir Saheb is chronologically closer to the modern era than to the Upanishads, yet he speaks the same truth, proving that the flame of knowledge burns continuously in every age. He further explains that the difficulty lies not in the absence of saints, but in the inability of the common person to recognize them. Just as a supersonic aircraft is heard only after it has passed, a saint is often recognized by the masses only long after they have departed. Recognition requires 'eyes' or spiritual sensitivity, which most people lack because they are spiritually asleep. People often fail to recognize a living saint because they compare them to past figures or get distracted by external factors like language, caste, or social status, as was the case with Kabir Saheb during his time. Acharya Prashant clarifies that the role of a Guru is not to provide more knowledge to be accumulated in the mind, but to liberate the seeker from all knowledge and mental conditioning. He cautions against hollow prayers for universal peace and bliss, suggesting that one must first attain self-realization before attempting to 'give' truth or love to others, as actions without realization often stem from ignorance and ego.