In response to a question about the rightness of premarital sex and casual physical intimacy among college students, Acharya Prashant challenges the underlying assumptions of the query. He begins by asking why the question is about pre-marital sex and not post-marital sex, pointing out that the questioner has implicitly accepted post-marital sex as granted and okay. He argues that the crucial factor is not whether the sexual encounter is pre-marital or post-marital, but the quality of the encounter and the consciousness of the individuals involved. He states that it depends on the people who are engaging in it. Acharya Prashant elaborates that there can be a lot of violence and exploitation even in post-marital sex, referencing the legal concept of marital rape. He criticizes the cultural prejudice that blindly approves of post-marital relations, such as preserving chastity only to hand it over to a stranger in an arranged marriage. Similarly, pre-marital encounters can also be of a very bad quality, like the casual flings in college that bring both individuals down. He asserts that what matters is the quality of the union of the two people, which is determined by their level of consciousness and the quality of their minds. The speaker contends that the issue stems from a deeper societal conditioning that begins at a very young age, citing the example of "nibba-nibbi" (immature teenage romance) culture. He explains that society needs to educate and mentor its youngsters, not regulate or police them. The goal should be to raise conscious, spiritually literate individuals who can make their own decisions. He emphasizes that if you love someone, you should give them wings, light, and self-knowledge, enabling them to fly on their own. The body is just a fact, a starting point, but not one's reality or destination. The purpose of life is to be liberated, to transcend one's gender. He concludes by stating that a truly beautiful woman is one who has transcended her womanliness, and the same applies to men.