Acharya Prashant explains that nationalism and patriotism are often superficial labels used by individuals to separate themselves from others to protect and sustain the ego. He argues that humans have a deep-seated need for identity, which leads them to create divisions based on religion, caste, and political entities. These boundaries, according to him, are artificial constructs that limit human potential and lead to immense suffering and violence. He points out that the history of mankind is filled with wars fought in the name of nationalism, where those at the forefront are celebrated as patriots despite the destruction they cause. He questions the utility of dividing the planet into nations and maintaining large armies. Acharya Prashant suggests that the existence of armies is a direct result of these artificial boundaries, leading to a cycle of fear and the accumulation of destructive nuclear weapons. He highlights the absurdity of celebrating military might and nuclear power, which are designed for annihilation rather than human benefit. He uses the example of the Indus River to illustrate how political boundaries restrict access to natural beauty and cultural heritage that should belong to all of humanity. Acharya Prashant distinguishes between the political entity of a country and its spiritual or intellectual essence. He expresses a deep fondness for the 'real India'—the land of the Upanishads, Buddha, and Mahavir—which he describes as a universal space of wisdom not confined by maps or geography. In this view, any intelligent person, regardless of their place of birth, belongs to this real India. He criticizes shallow patriotism that manifests as sports rivalry or public misconduct, urging a shift toward a more profound, boundary-less understanding of humanity. Addressing the humanitarian role of the army, he clarifies that while soldiers provide essential service during disasters, their primary function and the machinery of war they carry are oriented toward violence. He argues that a service-oriented force does not require weapons of destruction. Ultimately, he encourages the audience to inquire into why they desperately need boundaries and to recognize that every boundary is a form of mental separation that prevents true fearlessness and unity.