On YouTube
Your family size is NOT your personal matter. Sorry! || AP Neem Candies
4.7K views
4 years ago
Reproduction
Climate Change
Personal Choice
Carbon Footprint
Spirituality
Emotional Center
Compassion
Responsibility
Description

Acharya Prashant argues that a person reproducing blindly is a threat to the entire humanity, and thus, their family cannot be considered a personal matter. He uses the analogy of someone setting a time bomb in their home that is powerful enough to destroy the entire community, questioning if that would be considered a private matter. He asserts that if one's actions affect others, they are no longer personal choices. This situation requires being 'more than gentle,' which he clarifies does not mean cruelty, but rather more energetic action stemming from deeper compassion and a greater sense of responsibility. The speaker connects this to environmental impact, stating that while India's population is large, its per-capita carbon footprint is small. In contrast, the one or two children of an affluent family represent a far bigger problem due to their high carbon footprint. He explains that having a child is not merely adding one person but initiating a geometric progression, as that child and their descendants will continue to reproduce. Therefore, giving birth to one person is akin to giving birth to hundreds over time. He further illustrates this by citing an estimate that a woman can save six times more carbon emissions by having one less child than through a lifetime of climate activism like tree planting. The speaker identifies the root of the problem as the lack of spirituality. When people do not operate from a spiritual center, they operate from an emotional one, and these emotions are what cause climate change. He states, 'Emotion equals carbon in a big way,' as emotional desires for things like foreign holidays, nice homes, or even children are carbon-intensive. The ultimate solution, according to the speaker, is not superficial activism but spiritual awareness. He notes that many highly emotional people are involved in climate activism, even though the problem itself stems from emotions. The entire model of life, centered around the emotional self, is flawed and leads to the climate catastrophe. The most effective way to fight this menace is through spiritual awareness, but because this path is difficult, people prefer easier, ego-boosting actions like planting trees.