Acharya Prashant explains that even without knowing the specific facts about the dairy industry, one can understand the inherent cruelty by examining basic human nature. He posits that humans are generally greedy, and if an object or being can yield money, a greedy person will do anything to extract more from it. Applying this to the dairy industry, he states that since a cow or buffalo provides milk which translates to profit, it is inevitable that humans will exploit them to maximize output. This exploitation includes keeping the animal constantly pregnant through artificial insemination. He argues that since humans are often exploitative in all aspects of life, not even sparing their own families, it is illogical to assume they would spare a voiceless animal. He further elaborates on the biological inappropriateness of consuming another species' milk, especially in adulthood. He points out that in nature, no species consumes the milk of another, and milk is intended only for infants for a limited period. For example, buffalo milk is constituted to raise a large buffalo, not a human child, hence its different composition. Acharya Prashant finds it absurd that adults, who lack the enzymes to properly digest milk protein, consume what is essentially a baby's diet. He symbolically equates this to a state of mental immaturity, suggesting that even at an old age, many people are like infants who need to steal food from actual babies, the calves. Addressing the justification that Shri Krishna consumed milk, Acharya Prashant clarifies that this was only during his childhood, in accordance with the customs of his time and place as he was raised in a community of cattle-rearers. He explains that an avatar, or incarnation, is bound by the conventions of their era, and these time-bound attributes like diet or clothing are not meant to be emulated. The timeless aspect of Shri Krishna's teachings, he asserts, is the Bhagavad Gita, which should be followed and contains no mention of dairy consumption. He emphasizes that one should look to the essential, timeless teachings of an avatar, not their historical, time-bound habits. Finally, Acharya Prashant compares the bond between a human mother and her child to that of a cow and her calf. He describes the bond, often called love, as an animalistic attachment. If one acknowledges that humans are also animals, then the human mother and the cow are the same in this respect. Therefore, if one respects the bond between a human mother and her baby, it is hypocritical to disrespect the bond between a cow and her calf by separating them to take the milk. He dismisses the argument that milking is a favor to the cow as a false and imaginative justification.