Acharya Prashant addresses the question of whether it is good or bad to act without thinking. He explains that it can be both, depending on the situation. If an issue is complicated or tangled, then thinking is a good tool. The mind's ability to think is a valuable power, provided the issue is indeed tangled. However, thinking holds no importance in itself. Its only significance lies in its culmination into understanding. A thought that persists endlessly is merely a burden on the head. The only good thought is one that quickly subsides because the issue has been resolved. Once the confusion is cleared, there is nothing left to think about. Thinking should only be a temporary state. If it becomes a continuous activity, like that of a 'thinker' who contemplates day and night, that person will go mad. It is better to think for a while and then become silent, much like using a tool for a specific task and then setting it aside. Once the work is done, one can become thoughtless, quiet, and silent. Therefore, acting without thinking is a very good state to be in, provided there is pre-existing clarity. When clarity is already present, there is no need for further thought. Conversely, if there is no clarity and one still refrains from thinking, it becomes a problem. Thought is a tool to be used when a matter is tangled. If the matter is clear but one remains caught in thought, they are wasting time and damaging their mind.