Acharya Prashant addresses a question regarding the nature of the ego, doership, and the witness, emphasizing that spirituality must be subjective and personal rather than an objective or theoretical discussion. He challenges the questioner for speaking from the perspective of the Absolute while living as an individual, noting that if one were truly the Absolute, there would be no need for spiritual inquiry. He explains that spiritual teachings are like medicines; they are not the ultimate truth themselves but are tools used to treat the suffering of the individual. If the patient is false, the medicine cannot be real, yet its value lies in its usefulness in alleviating the patient's condition. He criticizes the tendency to treat spiritual scriptures and philosophies as objective axioms to be judged or compared from a distance. He argues that quoting scriptures about the ego being an illusion is hypocritical if one still operates under the belief of being a doer in daily life. Instead of acting as a judge over the words of seers like Shankaracharya or Nagarjuna, the seeker must examine their own life, actions, and beliefs. Acharya Prashant insists that the focus should remain on the subject's actual state—what they are doing, how they are living, and whether their current beliefs serve their well-being—rather than hiding behind high-sounding concepts like the witness or the Absolute.