Acharya Prashant addresses a question about whether one can change their partner without their cooperation. He uses the analogy of an alarm clock: if you are sleeping and your neighbor sets an alarm for you, you will not only turn off the alarm but also be angry with the neighbor. External help is only effective when there is an internal intention to change. You can wake up with an alarm, but only if you have already decided to wake up. The sincerity to change must come from within before any external aid can be useful. When asked where this sincerity comes from, Acharya Prashant explains that one should not be concerned with its origin. It can come from anywhere, and the distinction between 'inside' and 'outside' is itself doubtful. The pointer for change may appear external, but its appearance is what matters, not its source. He illustrates this by saying that what is inside is what appears outside. For instance, the reason one reads Nanak is that Nanak is already present within them. The world is a reflection of one's inner state. Addressing the feeling of spirituality being a heavy responsibility, Acharya Prashant calls it a delusion and an excuse of the mind to avoid change. The ego creates a framework and tries to fit everything, including the truth, within it. The truth is like a knife meant to cut this framework, but the ego instead uses it for decoration. The goal is not to acquire knowledge but to understand. He further clarifies that while a saint still has thoughts, they are different from ordinary thoughts. A saint's thoughts are directed towards the well-being of all, which is a virtuous thought. On the topic of cleaning the mind, he states it doesn't mean forgetting everything, as that would be madness. Knowledge is necessary for worldly life, such as using language. However, real knowledge is that which cuts through old, accumulated knowledge, thereby cleaning the mind. This self-knowledge must accompany worldly knowledge so that the latter does not have an adverse effect. Finally, he addresses the sadness felt when leaving a place. He explains that the mind is constituted to form attachments. He cites the Jain rule for monks to not stay in one place for more than three days to avoid attachment. He says we are eager to attach to anything when disconnected from the source. The important question is not what is left behind, but whether one has found that which is eternal. Life is like a journey; everything will be left behind. Before it ends, one must find that which is never lost.