Acharya Prashant addresses the issue of thoughts that feel very important and seem like the truth. He begins by stating clearly that a thought is not the truth. He explains that people tend to hold many things as firm truths, including the very sense of their own existence, the feeling of 'I am,' which is also just a thought. Instead of believing in such thoughts, he suggests adopting a better notion: 'Whatever I feel cannot be the truth. Thought cannot be the truth.' Since we are adept at believing things and holding onto them, he advises using this tendency to firmly hold this particular belief. He elaborates that as long as the fundamental ignorance of 'I am' persists, one cannot simply erase thoughts. The existence of 'I' is accompanied by the experience of objects, persons, and thoughts. These three categories constitute our entire world of experience. While none of them are the ultimate truth, they will continue to exist as long as the 'I' exists. Therefore, simply dismissing them as unreal is not a practical solution. When the 'I' dissolves, these three will no longer pose a problem, but until then, one will continue to have questions and issues related to them. The solution, Acharya Prashant explains, is to apply 'Vivek' or discrimination to these three categories. This means choosing wisely which objects, persons, and thoughts to engage with. The criterion for this choice is whether they lead towards truth and freedom or towards bondage and falsehood. For instance, with objects, one must discern which ones lead to truth. With people, one must choose the company that leads towards liberation. Similarly, with thoughts, since they will keep arising, one must practice discrimination by supporting the thoughts that go against the ego and dismissing those that nourish the ego.