Acharya Prashant addresses the issue of young men, aged 25-30, who stay at home unemployed and blame their families for their situation. They claim the environment at home is not conducive to work and lacks motivation. Conversely, their families complain that these men are lazy burdens who do nothing but eat and sleep, colloquially described as "breaking the cot and breaking the bread." The speaker explains that this is a comfortable arrangement for these men, who enjoy a life akin to that of a "Nawab" (a nobleman). He rhetorically asks who would refuse a life of luxury with a palace, servants, and immense wealth provided for free. While it is easy to claim one would reject such a life, history shows that very few, like a Buddha, have the strength to renounce such comforts. In fact, many have resorted to violence against their own families to gain power and wealth. Humans, by nature, find it difficult to refuse a life of ease. These unemployed men are living a "small-scale Nawabi" life at home. If not a grand kingdom, they have a small one where their mother acts as a servant, providing food, and their other needs like laundry and even carnal desires are met. With all comforts provided, there is no incentive for them to work hard. The speaker illustrates this with the story of Wajid Ali Shah, a ruler so dependent on luxury that he couldn't flee an attack because the servant who put on his shoes was absent. Acharya Prashant concludes by stating that ordinary humans are very close to animals in their nature. Just as an animal, like a dog, will remain loyal to whoever provides it with food, humans also become complacent when their needs are met without effort. The services received at home—food, laundry, and a clean bed—are not trivial; they hold significant value. If one gets bread easily, one is ready to become a dog at anyone's door. While this truth may be bitter, the speaker feels compelled to state it.