Acharya Prashant addresses the argument that if the world's 8 billion people became vegetarian, there would not be enough land for agriculture, leading to deforestation, thus making meat consumption necessary. He refutes this by explaining that the animals we kill and eat are first fed a vast amount of vegetarian food. He states that you may not understand that a significant portion of the world's agricultural land is used not to feed humans, but to feed the animals that we then consume. This farming is not for wild animals like monkeys or elephants, who fend for themselves, but for animals raised in slaughterhouses and large animal farms, which are fattened up before being served on our plates. The speaker asserts that the notion of land scarcity for a vegetarian world is a grave misunderstanding. He presents data indicating that 77% of agricultural land is dedicated to livestock. If humans were to stop eating meat, this land would become available for direct human food production, which would more than suffice. The scarcity of land is, in fact, caused by meat consumption. A meat-eater requires 17 times more land, 14 times more water, and 10 times more energy than a vegetarian. This is because an animal must consume 10 to 20 kilograms of grain to produce just one kilogram of meat. Furthermore, Acharya Prashant highlights the severe health consequences of meat-eating, linking it directly to fatal illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes, stroke, and cancer. He claims that if the world's population adopted a vegan diet, 8.1 million deaths could be prevented annually. He points out the stark contrast between the world's food deficit of 40 million tonnes and the 760 million tonnes of food fed to farm animals each year. The food that could feed the poor and hungry is instead given to animals like goats, cows, and buffaloes, so they can be killed and eaten. Finally, he connects the meat and dairy industries to climate change, identifying them as the primary or secondary cause of anthropogenic global warming. A global shift to a vegan diet could reduce food-related carbon emissions by as much as 70%. He suggests this information is deliberately suppressed by media and corporations with vested interests. He concludes by turning the initial question on its head, arguing that the real question is how the world can survive if meat consumption continues at its current unsustainable rate. The only way to save the planet, he contends, is to stop eating meat.