Acharya Prashant explains that in the Bhagavad Gita, Purush refers to Para Prakriti (the subtle elements or the seer), while Prakriti refers to Apara Prakriti (the gross elements or the scene). He clarifies that both the observer and the observed belong to the domain of Prakriti. The witness, or the Truth, stands apart from this duality. Regarding the concept of being born in a 'good' or 'evil' womb, he argues that this should not be taken literally to mean that a mother or a child is inherently evil. Instead, it refers to the child's biological conditioning and genetic coding, which may make them more or less vulnerable to certain influences. He emphasizes that every child is unique, like different chemical elements, and it is the responsibility of parents and guardians to provide an environment that facilitates inner growth rather than blaming the child's nature. Acharya Prashant further defines wisdom, or Gyana, as the simultaneous knowledge of both the subject and the object. He critiques the modern educational system for focusing solely on objective information while ignoring the self. True knowledge requires one to investigate the 'seer'—the one who is seeking the information. He uses the analogy of someone searching for how to make a bomb without questioning the internal hatred or motives driving that desire. To know Purush and Prakriti together means to constantly ask why one is doing what they are doing and to understand the inner fluctuations of the mind. He concludes that turning inward is not an exotic metaphor but a practical necessity for understanding how one's sense of self is often dependent on external situations.