Acharya Prashant responds to the question of how to dissolve by advising the questioner to watch the one who wants to dissolve. He prompts self-inquiry by asking who this entity is and why it desires dissolution. He points out a contradiction, questioning why someone who is serious and honest about dissolving has not already done so. He suggests that there must be something protecting this entity, and reveals that the one who says, "I want to dissolve," is the very same one who is keeping himself safe. The speaker explains that this resistance to dissolution stems from the pleasures the ego derives from its existence and usual activities. The ego does not exist for nothing; it persists because the 'I' finds pleasure in its current state. As long as one is not fed up with these pleasures and does not see through them, dissolution will not happen because the individual will not allow it to. He reframes dissolution as simply not wanting to remain as one is, a change that cannot be forced but is a byproduct of seeing or realization. Acharya Prashant challenges the questioner to first examine the arguments they hold against dissolution. He notes that everyone has strong arguments against it, and perhaps these arguments are valid. If the pleasures of the current state are deemed good, then there is no need to force dissolution. He advises figuring out one's own arguments against dissolution before seeking it, suggesting that if the arguments are valid, one should simply stay as they are and enjoy life, as there is no holy compulsion to dissolve.