Acharya Prashant explains that the Shanti Mantra, which states that the whole emerges from the whole, is not a logical statement but rather a transcendence of logic. Logic always involves cause and effect, requiring two distinct points in time and space. However, when it is said that the whole comes from the whole, it implies that nothing has actually originated from anywhere; what exists simply is. He emphasizes that the concept of origin is a creation of time and distance, whereas the truth is beyond such divisions. Therefore, the mantra should not be viewed as a logical seal or a fulfillment of a mission, but as a statement of deep faith that lies beyond the boundaries of logic and illogic. He further clarifies that logic dictates that if A equals B and C equals B, then A equals C. However, the mantra identifies 'this' as the whole and 'that' as the whole, and concludes that their union is also the whole. This defies logical definitions because 'this' and 'that' are conventionally seen as separate. Acharya Prashant suggests that the mantra is essentially pointing out the falsity of our perceptions and thoughts. It tells the listener that the world as they know it is an illusion. He relates this to the teachings of the Buddha, noting that while the Buddha did not use the word 'perfection' or 'wholeness', the essence of his messageโthat what appears to be is not the realityโis identical to the Shanti Mantra. Finally, Acharya Prashant discusses the nature of human certainty and ignorance. He points out that people often claim to know things despite having no real foundation for that knowledge. The Shanti Mantra serves as a call for humility, urging individuals to admit their ignorance. He asserts that there is a profound kind of knowing in the realization that one does not know. One who understands that their worldly knowledge is foolishness attains immediate realization, whereas those who cling to their supposed knowledge will never truly know the truth.
