Acharya Prashant explains that while it is true that right and wrong are not decided in the context of others and nobody has the right to label another person's decisions, it does not mean that the concepts of right and wrong decisions do not exist. To understand what constitutes a right decision, one must look at the fundamental, universal human need. All humans, irrespective of their background, fundamentally want peace, relaxation, and contentment. No one enjoys being tense, dissatisfied, hurt, or angry; everyone seeks a subtle, joyful state of consciousness. This universal need for peace and contentment serves as the ultimate criterion for judging one's own decisions. A decision is right for you if it leads to peace, joy, and contentment. Conversely, if your choices result in you becoming more insecure, anxious, jealous, unsettled, or restless, it would be dishonest to label those as right choices for yourself. The judgment is about the impact on your own inner self, not on others. The determination of a choice being right or wrong is not coming from others but from its effect on your own inner state. Regarding the idea that nature gives everyone the right to decide, Acharya Prashant clarifies that nature has also given everyone the right to decide foolishly. The right to choose is an option, and one can decide from two places: either from heartful intelligence or from the conditioned self. Choosing from the conditioned self is apparently easy as it requires little effort, which is why most people do it. However, the option to operate from the center of heartful intelligence is what brings joy, contentment, and liberation. This path is scarcely chosen because there is a price to pay, and few people are willing to pay it due to laziness and stinginess. It is therefore upon each individual to make good use of the power of choice vested in them.