On YouTube
ये वादे कभी पूरे नहीं होते || आचार्य प्रशांत, संत कबीर पर (2014)
आचार्य प्रशांत
3.3K views
7 years ago
Maya
Greed
Ego
Acquired Foolishness
Conditioning
Incompleteness
Morality
Love
Description

Acharya Prashant explains that Maya operates through greed, constantly pushing the mind to seek more for the expansion of the ego. This pursuit is driven by a perceived sense of incompleteness or a void that the mind attempts to fill. However, he clarifies that this void is not real; it is a self-generated illusion created by Maya to keep the individual in a state of perpetual seeking. By convincing the person that they are incomplete, Maya ensures that the effort to become whole only leads to further fragmentation and increased incompleteness. The speaker emphasizes that the mind creates this sense of lack to justify its own expansion, and the more one tries to fill this void with external things, the more the sense of incompleteness grows. He further discusses the concept of acquired foolishness, asserting that while people may act stupidly, it is not their true nature. This foolishness is a learned behavior resulting from conditioning. He illustrates this with the example of someone struggling to eat rice with a fork and knife because they were taught it is the only proper way, leading to acquired suffering. He emphasizes that if intelligence is one's true nature, then ignorance must be something learned. This conditioning starts in childhood, where instead of recognizing a child's inherent intelligence, they are fed social conditioning that limits their understanding and makes even simple truths seem difficult to grasp. Acharya Prashant also touches upon the teaching of values like love and morality. He argues that the very act of teaching love suggests a fundamental lack of it. When love is taught as a subject to the mind, it becomes smaller than the mind itself and loses its power to dissolve the ego. Similarly, the introduction of moral training or religious education is a sign that true morality or religion has already vanished. He concludes by comparing Maya to a neighbor who first makes one aware of a non-existent misery and then offers superficial remedies to fix it, thereby trapping the individual in a cycle of perceived deficiency and false solutions.