Acharya Prashant critiques the common understanding of witnessing, or 'Sakshi', which is often misinterpreted as merely observing everything. He explains that human observation is never objective; it is always driven by purpose, meaning, or self-interest, leading to immediate involvement and attachment. Therefore, defining a witness as one who 'sees' everything is flawed because the act of seeing, in the human context, implies being entangled with the object of sight. To correct this, he proposes a radical definition: a witness is one who sees nothing, possesses no senses, and is essentially non-existent or absent from the scene of worldly affairs. True witnessing is not about watching thoughts like clouds in the sky, as often described in popular spiritual literature; rather, it is being free from thoughts even while they exist. Acharya Prashant asserts that if one claims to be a witness, they have already failed because the claim itself arises from an ego that is present and involved. A witness is not a silent spectator hiding in a corner recording events; a witness is entirely absent from the 'room' of worldly transactions. He emphasizes that the witness belongs to a dimension beyond human reach and language. Discussing such concepts as if they are intellectual objects is a form of arrogance. He concludes that certain spiritual truths must remain beyond speech and thought, as they cannot be captured by the tongue or the intellect.