Acharya Prashant addresses the questioner's assumption that spirituality is illogical. He explains that this is a common misconception and that, in reality, spirituality is the very zenith of logic. He states that spirituality and logic go hand-in-hand. Spirituality is so profoundly logical that it reaches a point where logic itself cannot keep up and falls away, while spirituality continues. In this way, spirituality surpasses or transcends logic, but it never becomes illogical or anti-logical. It can be beyond logic, but it is never against logic. The speaker explains that the idea of spirituality being illogical stems from people who discuss it in the most illogical ways, or from powerful forces that promote superstition as spirituality. This gives the common person the impression that spirituality is nonsensical mumbo-jumbo. He clarifies that what is often called pseudoscience in the name of spirituality is, in fact, pure superstition, and calling it pseudoscience is an affront to science itself. This misrepresentation severs the true relationship between spirituality and logic in people's minds. This misunderstanding arises when an individual accepts someone who talks nonsense—such as raising the dead or being in two places at once—as a spiritual figure. Because this person is accepted as spiritual, their illogical and unscientific claims are also labeled as spirituality. Consequently, the listener concludes that spirituality itself is illogical. The speaker emphasizes that one must first question why they accept such figures and their nonsensical talk as spiritual in the first place. Acharya Prashant concludes by stating that a truly logical person will inevitably turn spiritual, as spirituality is the natural destiny of logic. When logic is honest, it must ultimately turn towards the logician—the self—which is its highest potential. A genuinely spiritual person can never contradict science. He points out that truly spiritual individuals have historically gotten along well with scientists, citing the conversations between J. Krishnamurti and the physicist David Bohm as an example.