Acharya Prashant addresses the issue of doubts that arise when others present logical arguments against one's actions. He explains that while these arguments may seem logical, they are fundamentally invalid because they operate on a different plane. Most logic provided by society is future-oriented, focusing on what one will gain or lose, whereas the state of being is rooted in the present moment. He emphasizes that you cannot prove these arguments wrong through logic because they are based on time, conditioning, and causality. The mistake lies in listening to these arguments and then attempting to find a valid logical answer to an invalid question. Since being is a matter of the present and logic is a matter of the future or past, the two do not meet. He advises recognizing that these arguments are irrelevant to the present state of being, as they are always centered on 'what will be achieved' or 'what has been gained,' which are concepts of time rather than the reality of the now.
