Acharya Prashant addresses the issue of women wearing revealing dresses by examining two sides: the woman wearing the clothes and those who react to her. He begins by questioning the mindset of those who are easily provoked by a woman's attire. He asks what kind of person gets so easily disturbed, suggesting that if a woman's legs are provocative, then her ankles, fingernails, or even her nose could also be considered provocative, leading to the absurd demand that she cover herself from head to toe. He likens this to Victorian England where even table legs were covered, calling it a matter of conditioning and a sign of mental illness, sexual fantasy, and inner perversion. He states that such people are sick and need rigorous counseling. Next, Acharya Prashant turns to the women who choose to wear such clothes. He asserts that while freedom must be respected, it must be genuine freedom, not conditioning. He acknowledges valid reasons for certain attire, such as functional utility (e.g., a swimsuit for swimming) or physical comfort (e.g., light clothing in hot weather). However, he questions the motive behind wearing revealing clothes in inappropriate situations, like sub-zero temperatures, suggesting it might be to garner male attention. He urges women to ask themselves why the male gaze is so important to them. He concludes by differentiating between seeking respect for one's body versus one's qualities. He explains that if a woman wants attention for her physical figure, people will always look down on her. Conversely, if people look at her for her qualities and accomplishments, they will always look up to her. He advises women to seek respect for higher reasons than just their physical appearance, as relating to others merely by advertising one's body is not a healthy basis for a relationship.