Acharya Prashant addresses the issue of women wearing revealing dresses by examining two sides: the woman who wears the clothes and the men who are provoked by them. He proposes a sincere discussion with both parties. Addressing the men who get provoked, he questions what kind of person is so easily disturbed by another's attire. He argues that if one is provoked by skimpy clothes, the same logic could absurdly extend to being provoked by ankles, fingernails, or even the mere thought of a woman. He labels this state as a mental illness, a sign of sexual fantasy and inner perversion, suggesting such individuals need rigorous counseling. He compares this mindset to the conditioning in Victorian England where even table legs were covered. He posits that spiritual education and an understanding of the body's transient nature—as mere bones, skin, and blood—would dissolve such fascinations. To the women, Acharya Prashant states that freedom must be respected, but it must be genuine freedom, not conditioning. He urges them to question their motives for their choice of dress. He acknowledges that if the reasons are for functional utility, such as for an athlete or a swimmer, or for physical comfort in hot weather, then no one has the right to object. However, he challenges the motive if it is to use the body to gather male attention, citing the example of wearing revealing clothes in sub-zero temperatures while men are heavily clothed. He advises that seeking respect for one's body is not a healthy psychological state. Instead, one should desire to be looked up to for their qualities and accomplishments, rather than being looked down upon for their physical form. He concludes that relating to others by merely advertising the body is not beneficial. He emphasizes that while freedom deserves respect, it must be true freedom, not a product of conditioning.