Acharya Prashant explains that the conflict faced by Arjun is not a personal one but represents the universal struggle of mankind. He clarifies that Shri Krishna and Arjun are both within us, with Shri Krishna representing the heart or the truth. Drawing from the Ken Upanishad, he emphasizes that the truth, or Brahm, cannot be known through mental activity, language, or the ego. When one claims to 'know' the truth, they have merely objectified it and brought it down to the plane of duality, thereby preserving the ego. The Rishi in the Upanishad asserts that those who claim to know the truth do not know it, because true knowing is not material information or a mental conclusion. Acharya Prashant highlights that the Ken Upanishad uses the method of 'neti neti' (not this, not this) to reject the false. He warns that whatever people worship or conceptualize is often a figment of their own imagination and ego. The truth is not something the eyes can see or the mind can think of; rather, it is the power behind the senses and the mind. He explains that the word 'Ken' means 'by whom,' prompting an inquiry into the source of the mind's search. The truth cannot be found in material objects or imagination, as the seeker and the world are one. Meditation, therefore, is the process of the person getting lost, rather than a state the ego can claim to possess. Finally, Acharya Prashant points out that the tendency to worship falseness and misinterpret spiritual terms like Samadhi or Anand is a basic, timeless tendency of the ego. He urges the listeners to see these teachings as immediately relevant to their own lives rather than as abstract concepts. He notes that silence or inertia in the face of truth is often a defense tactic used by the ego to protect the 'inner garbage' of falseness. By speaking out and engaging with the truth, one allows these false structures to be demolished.