Acharya Prashant explains that faith is a very simple thing. Because it is simple, people create complex interpretations for it. A simple thing can be dangerous because one cannot turn a blind eye to it. When something is simple and straightforward, it doesn't have multiple meanings, so you cannot play with it or give it distorted meanings. But if what is simple is also dangerous, then it becomes necessary to get rid of it. To get rid of it, it becomes necessary to create various distorted meanings. Faith means, 'The action that seems right to me with my utmost integrity, I will do it, and then whatever the result, I will consider that result auspicious.' In contrast, the common person lives in a state of lack of faith. This is because we perform actions in the hope of a certain result. This is called desire. The result is decided first, and then the action is chosen. The common definition of auspiciousness is when the actual result matches the expected result. This is a lack of faith because the ego has already decided what is good for it. This is not faith; it is a transaction, a business, the deceit of desire. All those who call themselves faithful, among them, maybe one in a million would actually have faith. We even insult the word 'faith'. To be faithful, one must be desireless. Because if there is desire, it will always be at the forefront and will determine the action. The ego is incomplete, and what is incomplete must have desires. Therefore, faith is impossible for the common person. They have changed the definition of faith and made lack of faith into faith. In faith, the first thing is the doer and the action. In lack of faith, the first thing is the fruit of the action or desire. Real faith is desireless action. It means, 'I don't know what the right outcome is, nor do I want to know. I know what the right action is, and whatever the result of the right action, I will accept it.' Regarding the image of God, the speaker says that if God is the father of all, then his image cannot be confined to one form. It would be an insult to make God's image only like a human, as he is also the father of animals, insects, and all of creation. Therefore, either all images are His, or He has no image. The speaker advises a questioner who finds it difficult to explain these concepts to others, saying that it takes a lot of effort and time. He mentions that it took him fifteen years to bring the questioner to this point of understanding, and that one should focus on their own understanding first. He concludes by saying that a temple should be a place for self-reflection and introspection, not for fulfilling desires or performing rituals. When a temple becomes the center of existence, then all social, economic, and political systems will naturally emerge from it.