Acharya Prashant addresses the recent uproar over distressing images from Manipur, noting that while the conflict has been ongoing for two to three months, it was largely ignored by the rest of India and the media. Only after old pictures of women being subjected to beastly, indecent, and sexual exploitation surfaced has there been a widespread sensation. He points out that this was not an isolated incident, and more such cases are now coming to light. The speaker asserts that the very reason for this public outcry is the same reason those women were mistreated and even murdered in the first place. The core of the issue, as explained by Acharya Prashant, is that society places paramount importance on a woman's sexuality. He illustrates this with an example: a father would be far more agitated if his daughter is teased (a form of sexual attack) than if her academic performance suffers due to someone's malice. This reveals how even a father, conditioned by patriarchy, primarily views his daughter through the lens of her sexuality, reducing her entire existence to this single aspect. This mindset is why society reacts strongly only to sexual crimes against women, while other atrocities are overlooked. Acharya Prashant argues that while a man is recognized by multiple identities such as his profession, caste, or spiritual inclination, a woman's identity is often reduced to just being 'a woman'—her sexual identity. Consequently, attacks on other dimensions of her personality, like depriving her of education, freedom, or safety, do not provoke the same level of outrage. He questions why society was not distressed earlier by the ongoing violence. While the sexual attack is heinous and demands the strictest action, the focus should not be limited to it. In conflicts and riots, rape is used as a weapon precisely because men have turned women's sexuality into a form of property and honor. The enemy attacks this 'sexual property' to inflict maximum shame and humiliation. Ultimately, the speaker traces this entire phenomenon back to male lust. It is man's lust that has disproportionately elevated the importance of a woman's sexuality, making it a symbol of honor and a target in conflicts. He contends that if not for this lust, the sexuality of the other gender would not be given such undue significance. The enemy, understanding this valuation, targets women's sexuality to break the spirit of their opponents, a tactic that works because society itself has made it such a monumental issue.