On YouTube
जहाँ भी भारत पिछड़ा है, क्या कारण धर्म है? || आचार्य प्रशांत (2023)
1M views
1 year ago
Hypocrisy
Simplicity
Desire
Religion
Love
Doership
Kabir Saheb
Nature
Description

Acharya Prashant begins by criticizing the widespread hypocrisy and dishonesty in people's lives. He points out the tendency to deny basic needs like sleep, food, clothing, or money, questioning the purpose of living if one claims to need nothing. He contrasts this with a truly liberated person who genuinely has no needs. The speaker argues that this inability to speak simple truths, such as a young man's natural attraction to a young woman, is a form of pretense. He states that for a young man, a young woman will be dear, not a donkey. The speaker labels this hypocrisy as a 'religious practice' of pretense (pakhand). This involves having inner desires while striving to appear cultured and righteous on the outside. He links this hypocrisy to the absence of love in India, which he claims is the reason the caste system persists. He argues that so-called 'religious people' who are merely cultured cannot truly love. He advises to be simple and accept oneself as a product of nature, which is also referred to as Mahadevi, Mahamaya, or the Great Mother (Mahamaa). There is no need to be ashamed of one's natural state. Addressing the question of whether religion is the cause of India's backwardness, Acharya Prashant explains that all external actions, like changing clothes or performing worship, are 'karma'. He says the Gita repeatedly draws attention to the 'doer' (karta). If the sense of doership is gone and the ego is fulfilled, it is acceptable to do nothing, like a python (ajgar). However, he notes this is rare. More often, when the ego is dissolved, one's actions become even more intense because there is nothing left to protect. One then acts freely, like a warrior without armor. In contrast, when the ego is intact, claiming to want nothing is a way to protect the ego, as any action might shatter it. This inaction stems from a deep-seated ego, not from a state of non-doership. Acharya Prashant criticizes the Indian tendency to be content with incompleteness, calling it a crime and a pretense to preserve that very incompleteness. He quotes Kabir Saheb: "The pining lover is like wet wood, smoldering and smoking. Let the fire of separation break out, so that all of it burns away." He explains that many people are like wet wood, neither fully burning nor fully extinguished. He concludes by urging people to either be consumed by the fire of longing or be completely calm, as the state of simmering is not beneficial. He emphasizes that one should live with their dissatisfaction honestly, as it is the reality of an incomplete being. He says, "I was born incomplete, by the will of the mother. But now I am conscious, now it is my will. I will not die incomplete."